Trang chủ
Australia Initiated an investigation against the "aluminium extrusion" imported from Malaysia and Vietnam
18/08/2016 12:00
On August 16, 2016, the Anti-Dumping Commission of Australia has decided to initiate the investigation applying anti-dumping measures (AD) and anti-subsidy (CVD) against the "aluminium extrusion" imported from Malaysia and Vietnam.
Earlier, On June 27 2016, CAPRAL Limited Company, a manufacturer of aluminum products pressed charges to the Anti-Dumping Commission of Australia to request an investigation applying anti-dumping measures (AD) and anti-subsidy (CVD ) against the "aluminium extrusion" imported from Malaysia and Vietnam
Relevant information:
1. Plaintiff: CAPRAL Limited Company
2. Investigated products: aluminium extrusion
3. Anti-dumping and anti-subsidy investigation period: July 1 2015 - June 30 2016
4. Damage investigation period: from Jylu 1 2012
5. Alleged dumping margin: 10,19%
6. Estimated subsidizing rate: over negligible level
7. Alleged subsidy programs: preferential import tax (for fixed asset of investment projects), the preferential enterprise income tax, tax incentives for non-agricultural land.
8. Damage: The plaintiffs allege that the products under investigation were dumped and received countervailable subsidies and thereby caused damages to Australia's manufacturing industry under the form of: keeping prices down, reducing profits, reducing investment income , increasing goods in inventory.
Earlier, On June 27 2016, CAPRAL Limited Company, a manufacturer of aluminum products pressed charges to the Anti-Dumping Commission of Australia to request an investigation applying anti-dumping measures (AD) and anti-subsidy (CVD ) against the "aluminium extrusion" imported from Malaysia and Vietnam
Relevant information:
1. Plaintiff: CAPRAL Limited Company
2. Investigated products: aluminium extrusion
3. Anti-dumping and anti-subsidy investigation period: July 1 2015 - June 30 2016
4. Damage investigation period: from Jylu 1 2012
5. Alleged dumping margin: 10,19%
6. Estimated subsidizing rate: over negligible level
7. Alleged subsidy programs: preferential import tax (for fixed asset of investment projects), the preferential enterprise income tax, tax incentives for non-agricultural land.
8. Damage: The plaintiffs allege that the products under investigation were dumped and received countervailable subsidies and thereby caused damages to Australia's manufacturing industry under the form of: keeping prices down, reducing profits, reducing investment income , increasing goods in inventory.
| Tải tài liệu | |
|---|---|
| Initiation of an Investigation | |
Các tin khác
- Cục Phòng vệ thương mại tiếp nhận hồ sơ đầy đủ, hợp lệ yêu cầu điều tra áp dụng biện pháp chống bán phá giá đối với sản phẩm thép mạ từ Cộng hòa nhân dân Trung Hoa và Đại Hàn Dân quốc (06/05/2024)
- Hoa Kỳ nhận hồ sơ đề nghị điều tra chống bán phá giá và chống trợ cấp đối với sản phẩm pin năng lượng mặt trời nhập khẩu từ Việt Nam (04/05/2024)
- Mỹ không dễ đánh thuế pin mặt trời Trung Quốc (04/05/2024)
- EU cấm hàng hóa sử dụng lao động cưỡng bức (26/04/2024)
- Mexico tăng thuế hơn 500 mặt hàng nhằm bảo vệ sản xuất trong nước (26/04/2024)
