Trang chủ
Australia Initiated an investigation against the "aluminium extrusion" imported from Malaysia and Vietnam
18/08/2016 12:00
On August 16, 2016, the Anti-Dumping Commission of Australia has decided to initiate the investigation applying anti-dumping measures (AD) and anti-subsidy (CVD) against the "aluminium extrusion" imported from Malaysia and Vietnam.
Earlier, On June 27 2016, CAPRAL Limited Company, a manufacturer of aluminum products pressed charges to the Anti-Dumping Commission of Australia to request an investigation applying anti-dumping measures (AD) and anti-subsidy (CVD ) against the "aluminium extrusion" imported from Malaysia and Vietnam
Relevant information:
1. Plaintiff: CAPRAL Limited Company
2. Investigated products: aluminium extrusion
3. Anti-dumping and anti-subsidy investigation period: July 1 2015 - June 30 2016
4. Damage investigation period: from Jylu 1 2012
5. Alleged dumping margin: 10,19%
6. Estimated subsidizing rate: over negligible level
7. Alleged subsidy programs: preferential import tax (for fixed asset of investment projects), the preferential enterprise income tax, tax incentives for non-agricultural land.
8. Damage: The plaintiffs allege that the products under investigation were dumped and received countervailable subsidies and thereby caused damages to Australia's manufacturing industry under the form of: keeping prices down, reducing profits, reducing investment income , increasing goods in inventory.
Earlier, On June 27 2016, CAPRAL Limited Company, a manufacturer of aluminum products pressed charges to the Anti-Dumping Commission of Australia to request an investigation applying anti-dumping measures (AD) and anti-subsidy (CVD ) against the "aluminium extrusion" imported from Malaysia and Vietnam
Relevant information:
1. Plaintiff: CAPRAL Limited Company
2. Investigated products: aluminium extrusion
3. Anti-dumping and anti-subsidy investigation period: July 1 2015 - June 30 2016
4. Damage investigation period: from Jylu 1 2012
5. Alleged dumping margin: 10,19%
6. Estimated subsidizing rate: over negligible level
7. Alleged subsidy programs: preferential import tax (for fixed asset of investment projects), the preferential enterprise income tax, tax incentives for non-agricultural land.
8. Damage: The plaintiffs allege that the products under investigation were dumped and received countervailable subsidies and thereby caused damages to Australia's manufacturing industry under the form of: keeping prices down, reducing profits, reducing investment income , increasing goods in inventory.
| Tải tài liệu | |
|---|---|
| Initiation of an Investigation | |
Các tin khác
- Cục PVTM ban hành Bản câu hỏi điều tra áp dụng biện pháp CBPG đối với thanh thép dự ứng lực có xuất xứ từ Trung Quốc (AD24) (28/08/2026)
- Hoa Kỳ công bố việc áp dụng biện pháp tự vệ toàn cầu trong vụ việc Hoa Kỳ điều tra tự vệ với sản phẩm mặt đá thạch anh (TA-201-79) (24/08/2026)
- 20 doanh nghiệp thép Việt Nam liên quan trong vụ điều tra chống bán phá giá tại Đài Loan (24/08/2026)
- BCT ban hành Quyết định về kết quả rà soát lần thứ ba việc áp dụng biện pháp CBPG đối với một số sản phẩm thép hình chữ H từ Trung Quốc (24/08/2026)
- Thông báo tiếp nhận hồ sơ yêu cầu rà soát biện pháp CBPG đối với thép hợp kim hoặc không hợp kim từ Hàn Quốc và Trung Quốc (21/08/2026)
