Trang chủ
Australia Initiated an investigation against the "aluminium extrusion" imported from Malaysia and Vietnam
18/08/2016 12:00
On August 16, 2016, the Anti-Dumping Commission of Australia has decided to initiate the investigation applying anti-dumping measures (AD) and anti-subsidy (CVD) against the "aluminium extrusion" imported from Malaysia and Vietnam.
Earlier, On June 27 2016, CAPRAL Limited Company, a manufacturer of aluminum products pressed charges to the Anti-Dumping Commission of Australia to request an investigation applying anti-dumping measures (AD) and anti-subsidy (CVD ) against the "aluminium extrusion" imported from Malaysia and Vietnam
Relevant information:
1. Plaintiff: CAPRAL Limited Company
2. Investigated products: aluminium extrusion
3. Anti-dumping and anti-subsidy investigation period: July 1 2015 - June 30 2016
4. Damage investigation period: from Jylu 1 2012
5. Alleged dumping margin: 10,19%
6. Estimated subsidizing rate: over negligible level
7. Alleged subsidy programs: preferential import tax (for fixed asset of investment projects), the preferential enterprise income tax, tax incentives for non-agricultural land.
8. Damage: The plaintiffs allege that the products under investigation were dumped and received countervailable subsidies and thereby caused damages to Australia's manufacturing industry under the form of: keeping prices down, reducing profits, reducing investment income , increasing goods in inventory.
Earlier, On June 27 2016, CAPRAL Limited Company, a manufacturer of aluminum products pressed charges to the Anti-Dumping Commission of Australia to request an investigation applying anti-dumping measures (AD) and anti-subsidy (CVD ) against the "aluminium extrusion" imported from Malaysia and Vietnam
Relevant information:
1. Plaintiff: CAPRAL Limited Company
2. Investigated products: aluminium extrusion
3. Anti-dumping and anti-subsidy investigation period: July 1 2015 - June 30 2016
4. Damage investigation period: from Jylu 1 2012
5. Alleged dumping margin: 10,19%
6. Estimated subsidizing rate: over negligible level
7. Alleged subsidy programs: preferential import tax (for fixed asset of investment projects), the preferential enterprise income tax, tax incentives for non-agricultural land.
8. Damage: The plaintiffs allege that the products under investigation were dumped and received countervailable subsidies and thereby caused damages to Australia's manufacturing industry under the form of: keeping prices down, reducing profits, reducing investment income , increasing goods in inventory.
| Tải tài liệu | |
|---|---|
| Initiation of an Investigation | |
Các tin khác
- EU thông báo mức thuế chống bán phá giá tạm thời đề xuất đối với sản phẩm ống đồng nhập khẩu từ Việt Nam (19/10/2026)
- Canada ban hành kết luận rà soát cuối kỳ biện pháp CBPG đối với ống thép dẫn (19/10/2026)
- Ấn Độ khởi xướng điều tra CBPG và CTC đối với ống đồng rãnh trong có xuất xứ hoặc nhập khẩu từ Việt Nam, Trung Quốc và Thái Lan (06/10/2026)
- Thông báo tiếp nhận hồ sơ đề nghị miễn trừ áp dụng biện pháp phòng vệ thương mại cho thời kỳ năm 2027 (06/10/2026)
- Liên minh Châu Âu (EU) thông báo áp dụng biện pháp tự vệ tạm thời đối với sản phẩm thép điện định hướng dạng hạt (GOES) (27/09/2026)
