Trang chủ
Australia Initiated an investigation against the "aluminium extrusion" imported from Malaysia and Vietnam
18/08/2016 12:00
On August 16, 2016, the Anti-Dumping Commission of Australia has decided to initiate the investigation applying anti-dumping measures (AD) and anti-subsidy (CVD) against the "aluminium extrusion" imported from Malaysia and Vietnam.
Earlier, On June 27 2016, CAPRAL Limited Company, a manufacturer of aluminum products pressed charges to the Anti-Dumping Commission of Australia to request an investigation applying anti-dumping measures (AD) and anti-subsidy (CVD ) against the "aluminium extrusion" imported from Malaysia and Vietnam
Relevant information:
1. Plaintiff: CAPRAL Limited Company
2. Investigated products: aluminium extrusion
3. Anti-dumping and anti-subsidy investigation period: July 1 2015 - June 30 2016
4. Damage investigation period: from Jylu 1 2012
5. Alleged dumping margin: 10,19%
6. Estimated subsidizing rate: over negligible level
7. Alleged subsidy programs: preferential import tax (for fixed asset of investment projects), the preferential enterprise income tax, tax incentives for non-agricultural land.
8. Damage: The plaintiffs allege that the products under investigation were dumped and received countervailable subsidies and thereby caused damages to Australia's manufacturing industry under the form of: keeping prices down, reducing profits, reducing investment income , increasing goods in inventory.
Earlier, On June 27 2016, CAPRAL Limited Company, a manufacturer of aluminum products pressed charges to the Anti-Dumping Commission of Australia to request an investigation applying anti-dumping measures (AD) and anti-subsidy (CVD ) against the "aluminium extrusion" imported from Malaysia and Vietnam
Relevant information:
1. Plaintiff: CAPRAL Limited Company
2. Investigated products: aluminium extrusion
3. Anti-dumping and anti-subsidy investigation period: July 1 2015 - June 30 2016
4. Damage investigation period: from Jylu 1 2012
5. Alleged dumping margin: 10,19%
6. Estimated subsidizing rate: over negligible level
7. Alleged subsidy programs: preferential import tax (for fixed asset of investment projects), the preferential enterprise income tax, tax incentives for non-agricultural land.
8. Damage: The plaintiffs allege that the products under investigation were dumped and received countervailable subsidies and thereby caused damages to Australia's manufacturing industry under the form of: keeping prices down, reducing profits, reducing investment income , increasing goods in inventory.
| Tải tài liệu | |
|---|---|
| Initiation of an Investigation | |
Các tin khác
- Bộ Công Thương gia hạn biện pháp phòng vệ thương mại với đường Thái Lan (05/06/2026)
- New Zealand khởi xướng tự vệ toàn cầu đối với một số sản phẩm thanh nhôm định hình (05/06/2026)
- BCT tổ chức buổi tham vấn công khai vụ việc điều tra áp dụng biện pháp chống lẩn tránh biện pháp PVTM đối với thép cán nóng từ Trung Quốc (AC03.AD20) (05/06/2026)
- Hoa Kỳ ban hành bản câu hỏi lượng và giá trị điều tra CBPG và CTC đối với sản phẩm máy nén khí nhập khẩu từ Việt Nam (29/05/2026)
- Mexico khởi xướng rà soát biện pháp CBPG đối với dây hàn nhập khẩu từ Việt Nam (29/05/2026)
