Australia Initiated an investigation against the "aluminium extrusion" imported from Malaysia and Vietnam
18/08/2016 12:00
On August 16, 2016, the Anti-Dumping Commission of Australia has decided to initiate the investigation applying anti-dumping measures (AD) and anti-subsidy (CVD) against the "aluminium extrusion" imported from Malaysia and Vietnam.
Earlier, On June 27 2016, CAPRAL Limited Company, a manufacturer of aluminum products pressed charges to the Anti-Dumping Commission of Australia to request an investigation applying anti-dumping measures (AD) and anti-subsidy (CVD ) against the "aluminium extrusion" imported from Malaysia and Vietnam
Relevant information:
1. Plaintiff: CAPRAL Limited Company
2. Investigated products: aluminium extrusion
3. Anti-dumping and anti-subsidy investigation period: July 1 2015 - June 30 2016
4. Damage investigation period: from Jylu 1 2012
5. Alleged dumping margin: 10,19%
6. Estimated subsidizing rate: over negligible level
7. Alleged subsidy programs: preferential import tax (for fixed asset of investment projects), the preferential enterprise income tax, tax incentives for non-agricultural land.
8. Damage: The plaintiffs allege that the products under investigation were dumped and received countervailable subsidies and thereby caused damages to Australia's manufacturing industry under the form of: keeping prices down, reducing profits, reducing investment income , increasing goods in inventory.
Earlier, On June 27 2016, CAPRAL Limited Company, a manufacturer of aluminum products pressed charges to the Anti-Dumping Commission of Australia to request an investigation applying anti-dumping measures (AD) and anti-subsidy (CVD ) against the "aluminium extrusion" imported from Malaysia and Vietnam
Relevant information:
1. Plaintiff: CAPRAL Limited Company
2. Investigated products: aluminium extrusion
3. Anti-dumping and anti-subsidy investigation period: July 1 2015 - June 30 2016
4. Damage investigation period: from Jylu 1 2012
5. Alleged dumping margin: 10,19%
6. Estimated subsidizing rate: over negligible level
7. Alleged subsidy programs: preferential import tax (for fixed asset of investment projects), the preferential enterprise income tax, tax incentives for non-agricultural land.
8. Damage: The plaintiffs allege that the products under investigation were dumped and received countervailable subsidies and thereby caused damages to Australia's manufacturing industry under the form of: keeping prices down, reducing profits, reducing investment income , increasing goods in inventory.
Tải tài liệu | |
---|---|
Initiation of an Investigation |
Các tin khác
- Hàn Quốc tiếp nhận Hồ sơ đề nghị điều tra chống bán phá giá đối với mặt hàng thép không gỉ cán nguội có xuất xứ hoặc nhập khẩu từ Việt Nam (17/05/2024)
- Mỹ điều tra các sản phẩm năng lượng Mặt Trời nhập khẩu từ Đông Nam Á (17/05/2024)
- Thái Lan xem xét biện pháp chống bán phá giá mới đối với thép Trung Quốc (15/05/2024)
- Cùng lúc DN Việt Nam đề nghị điều tra chống bán phá giá HRC, Thái Lan muốn mở rộng các biện pháp CBPG mới đối với thép Trung Quốc (13/05/2024)
- Hoa Kỳ thông báo khởi xướng rà soát cuối kỳ lần thứ nhất sản phẩm túi dệt nhâp khẩu từ Việt Nam (10/05/2024)