Trang chủ
Australia Initiated an investigation against the "aluminium extrusion" imported from Malaysia and Vietnam
18/08/2016 12:00
On August 16, 2016, the Anti-Dumping Commission of Australia has decided to initiate the investigation applying anti-dumping measures (AD) and anti-subsidy (CVD) against the "aluminium extrusion" imported from Malaysia and Vietnam.
Earlier, On June 27 2016, CAPRAL Limited Company, a manufacturer of aluminum products pressed charges to the Anti-Dumping Commission of Australia to request an investigation applying anti-dumping measures (AD) and anti-subsidy (CVD ) against the "aluminium extrusion" imported from Malaysia and Vietnam
Relevant information:
1. Plaintiff: CAPRAL Limited Company
2. Investigated products: aluminium extrusion
3. Anti-dumping and anti-subsidy investigation period: July 1 2015 - June 30 2016
4. Damage investigation period: from Jylu 1 2012
5. Alleged dumping margin: 10,19%
6. Estimated subsidizing rate: over negligible level
7. Alleged subsidy programs: preferential import tax (for fixed asset of investment projects), the preferential enterprise income tax, tax incentives for non-agricultural land.
8. Damage: The plaintiffs allege that the products under investigation were dumped and received countervailable subsidies and thereby caused damages to Australia's manufacturing industry under the form of: keeping prices down, reducing profits, reducing investment income , increasing goods in inventory.
Earlier, On June 27 2016, CAPRAL Limited Company, a manufacturer of aluminum products pressed charges to the Anti-Dumping Commission of Australia to request an investigation applying anti-dumping measures (AD) and anti-subsidy (CVD ) against the "aluminium extrusion" imported from Malaysia and Vietnam
Relevant information:
1. Plaintiff: CAPRAL Limited Company
2. Investigated products: aluminium extrusion
3. Anti-dumping and anti-subsidy investigation period: July 1 2015 - June 30 2016
4. Damage investigation period: from Jylu 1 2012
5. Alleged dumping margin: 10,19%
6. Estimated subsidizing rate: over negligible level
7. Alleged subsidy programs: preferential import tax (for fixed asset of investment projects), the preferential enterprise income tax, tax incentives for non-agricultural land.
8. Damage: The plaintiffs allege that the products under investigation were dumped and received countervailable subsidies and thereby caused damages to Australia's manufacturing industry under the form of: keeping prices down, reducing profits, reducing investment income , increasing goods in inventory.
| Tải tài liệu | |
|---|---|
| Initiation of an Investigation | |
Các tin khác
- Cục PVTM thông báo tiếp nhận hồ sơ rà soát cuối kỳ việc áp dụng biện pháp CBPG đối với một số sản phẩm sợi dài làm từ polyester từ Ấn Độ, In-đô-nê-xi-a, Ma-lai-xi-a và Trung Hoa (04/07/2025)
- BCT ban hành Quyết định về kết quả rà soát cuối kỳ việc áp dụng biện pháp CBPG đối với một số sản phẩm bột ngọt từ In-đô-nê-xi-a và Trung Hoa (04/07/2025)
- BCT ban hành Quyết định rà soát rà soát NXK mới trong vụ việc áp dụng biện pháp chống lẩn tránh biện pháp PVTM đối với một số sản phẩm đường mía từ Cam-pu-chia, In-đô-nê-xi-a, Lào, Ma-lai-xi-a và Mi-an-ma (04/07/2025)
- Bản câu hỏi vụ việc rà soát cuối kỳ việc áp dụng biện pháp CBPG và CTC đối với sản phẩm đường từ Thái Lan (02/07/2025)
- Cục PVTM ban hành Bản câu hỏi điều tra dành cho NSX/XK nước ngoài trong vụ việc rà soát cuối kỳ việc áp dụng biện pháp CBPG và CTC đối với sản phẩm đường từ Thái Lan (30/06/2025)
